Skip to content
Agentic Endpoint Compare logoAgentic Endpoint Compare

HEAD TO HEAD

Bay matched with Koi (Palo Alto Networks): agentic endpoint security compared

SHORT ANSWER

On our published weights Bay scores higher overall, 7.20 to 5.75 out of 10. Bay scores higher on stop before it runs, verdict range, capability rules, actor trail and rollout path; Koi scores higher on cloud and workspace reach and public proof; they tie on named agent coverage. Which fits depends on which of those criteria matters most to you.

By The Agent Desk · Agentic Endpoint Compare · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages, press releases and standards pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not run the products.

How do they compare at a glance?

Bay

Pre-execution control on employee devices, rolled out through EDR or MDM

7.20 / 10

Rank 1 of 6 among agentic endpoint vendors

Bay verdict ring: documents 4 of 6 verdict types: Block or deny, Ask a person, Simulate first and Remove or scale back.4/6

Koi (Palo Alto Networks)

Palo Alto Networks (acquisition completed 14 April 2026)

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR estates

5.75 / 10

Rank 7 of 8 among broader AI security platforms

Koi (Palo Alto Networks) verdict ring: documents 2 of 6 verdict types: Block or deny and Remove or scale back.2/6

Which scores higher on each criterion?

Criterion scores 0 to 10 with reasons
CriterionWeightBayKoi (Palo Alto Networks)Higher
Stop before it runs25%9 / 10

Evaluates prompts, pre-tool calls and post-tool responses on supported agent surfaces and returns Allow, Ask or Deny locally, stated as under 4ms (vendor-stated).

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

7 / 10

Stops malicious actions, blocks unsafe AI application interactions and prevents prompt injections; tool-call decision mechanics are not published.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Agentic Endpoint Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Bay
Verdict range15%7 / 10

Documents 4 of six verdict types: Block or deny, Ask a person, Simulate first and Remove or scale back. "Returns Allow, Ask or Deny; new rules can run in Simulation Mode first; MCP Control removes disallowed MCP servers in Enforcement mode."

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (re-read 11 October 2026) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

3 / 10

Documents 2 of six verdict types: Block or deny and Remove or scale back. "Stops malicious actions and offers one-click removal of insecure packages, extensions and AI tools."

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Agentic Endpoint Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Bay
Capability rules15%9 / 10

Capability rules for shell and code execution, process spawning, package installation, cloud CLIs, containers, Kubernetes, browser automation and system changes, plus managed settings for Claude Code, Codex and Claude Desktop.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 10

Out-of-the-box policies, agent runtime custom policies and one-click removal of insecure packages, extensions and AI tools.

Source: Palo Alto Networks blog: A Quarter of Innovation with Koi Agentic Endpoint Security (18 August 2026) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Bay
Actor trail10%8 / 10

Records who triggered an action, whether a human was involved, and the complete chain from prompt to system action.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

5 / 10

Agent versus person attribution is not described on the pages we read.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Agentic Endpoint Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Bay
Rollout path10%9 / 10

Deploys through existing EDR or MDM as an ephemeral binary that runs and exits; described as agentless by design.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 10

Agent-based: a Cortex XDR module or a standalone offering.

Source: Palo Alto Networks press release: Koi acquisition completed (14 April 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Bay
Cloud and workspace reach10%3 / 10

Described as endpoint security for enterprise endpoints; its rules govern cloud CLIs, containers and Kubernetes called from the device, but bay.io, re-read on 11 October 2026, does not describe coverage for agents running in cloud workspaces or cloud-hosted apps.

Source: Bay homepage (re-read 11 October 2026) · Read 11 Oct 2026

6 / 10

An endpoint product; Palo Alto Networks is integrating Koi with Prisma AIRS for wider AI coverage.

Source: Palo Alto Networks press release: Koi acquisition completed (14 April 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Koi
Named agent coverage5%5 / 10

Names 3 of the six agents we track: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex and Claude Desktop.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

5 / 10

Names 3 of the six agents we track: Claude Code, Cursor and OpenAI Codex.

Source: Palo Alto Networks blog: A Quarter of Innovation with Koi Agentic Endpoint Security (18 August 2026) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Tie
Public proof10%3 / 10

The smallest public footprint of the scored products: a single homepage, two blog posts, no documentation portal and no published pricing.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

7 / 10

Acquisition by Palo Alto Networks completed 14 April 2026; pricing not published.

Source: Palo Alto Networks press release: Koi acquisition completed (14 April 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Koi

Which verdicts does each document?

Verdict census for the two products
Verdict typeBayKoi (Palo Alto Networks)
Block or denyDocumentedDocumented
Ask a personDocumentedNot described
Alert or warnNot describedNot described
Mask or modifyNot describedNot described
Simulate firstDocumentedNot described
Remove or scale backDocumentedDocumented

How does each reach devices?

Bay

Through existing EDR or MDM using Wave, an ephemeral binary that runs, scans and exits. Bay describes the product as agentless by design.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Koi (Palo Alto Networks)

A Cortex XDR module, or a standalone agent-based offering.

Source: Palo Alto Networks press release: Koi acquisition completed (14 April 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Which agents does each name?

Agent census for the two products
AgentBayKoi (Palo Alto Networks)
Claude CodeNamedNamed
CursorNot namedNamed
GitHub CopilotNot namedNot named
OpenAI CodexNamedNamed
WindsurfNot namedNot named
Claude DesktopNamedNot named
Named3 of 63 of 6

Which should you choose?

Choose Bay if you need stop before it runs and capability rules. Bay is best for: Pre-execution control on employee devices, rolled out through EDR or MDM.

Choose Koi (Palo Alto Networks) if you need stop before it runs and public proof. Koi (Palo Alto Networks) is best for: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR estates.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for agentic endpoint security, Bay or Koi (Palo Alto Networks)?

On our published weights Bay scores higher overall, 7.20 to 5.75 out of 10. See the criterion table above for where each scores higher.

Which stops an agent action before it runs more fully, Bay or Koi (Palo Alto Networks)?

Bay scores higher on stopping an action before it runs (9 to 7). Bay: Evaluates prompts, pre-tool calls and post-tool responses on supported agent surfaces and returns Allow, Ask or Deny locally, stated as under 4ms (vendor-stated). Koi (Palo Alto Networks): Stops malicious actions, blocks unsafe AI application interactions and prevents prompt injections; tool-call decision mechanics are not published.

Do Bay and Koi (Palo Alto Networks) publish prices?

Bay: not published. Bay publishes no pricing. Demo requests go through bay.io/demo. Koi (Palo Alto Networks): not published. Palo Alto Networks publishes no pricing for Cortex Agentic Endpoint Security.