Skip to content
Agentic Endpoint Compare logoAgentic Endpoint Compare

ESTIMATOR

Agent risk estimator: match agentic endpoint controls to the agents you run

SHORT ANSWER

Tell the estimator which agents your people run, where they run and what they are allowed to do, then set how much each criterion matters. It counts your exposure on a plain checklist, shows which products name your agents and document the verdicts you need, and re-ranks all thirteen scored products on your weights. Scores are editorial; nothing here measures your environment.

1. Agents in use
2. Where do they run?
3. What can your agents do today?
4. Verdicts you need
5. Agent filter
6. How much each criterion matters

What is your exposure?

Your agents can do 0 of the 6 things on our checklist.

Narrow

This is a checklist count, not a measured risk score. It tells you which criteria to weigh more, nothing about your environment.

Which products fit your weights?

Products ranked by re-weighted score
RankProductRe-weighted scorePublished weightsYour agents namedYour verdicts documentedCloud reach
1Bay7.20 / 107.20 · rank 11 of 3

Not named: Cursor and GitHub Copilot

1 of 13 / 10
Tied T-2Neo6.85 / 106.85 · rank T-22 of 3

Not named: Cursor

1 of 15 / 10
Tied T-2Onyx Security6.85 / 106.85 · rank T-20 of 3

Not named: Claude Code, Cursor and GitHub Copilot

1 of 19 / 10
4Zenity6.75 / 106.75 · rank 43 of 31 of 19 / 10
5Noma Security6.55 / 106.55 · rank 52 of 3

Not named: GitHub Copilot

1 of 19 / 10
6Lasso Security6.40 / 106.40 · rank 62 of 3

Not named: GitHub Copilot

1 of 16 / 10
7CrowdStrike Falcon Guardian6.25 / 106.25 · rank 71 of 3

Not named: Cursor and GitHub Copilot

1 of 18 / 10
8Harmonic Security5.90 / 105.90 · rank 82 of 3

Not named: Cursor

1 of 14 / 10
9Ent5.80 / 105.80 · rank 93 of 31 of 13 / 10
10Koi (Palo Alto Networks)5.75 / 105.75 · rank 102 of 3

Not named: GitHub Copilot

1 of 16 / 10
11Prompt Security (SentinelOne)5.45 / 105.45 · rank 113 of 31 of 16 / 10
12Glow Security5.40 / 105.40 · rank 121 of 3

Not named: Cursor and GitHub Copilot

1 of 14 / 10
13Bloom Security4.65 / 104.65 · rank 130 of 3

Not named: Claude Code, Cursor and GitHub Copilot

1 of 12 / 10

Formula: re-weighted score = sum(criterion score × your weight) / sum(your weights). Criterion scores are our published editorial scores from 0 to 10, from vendor pages read on 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026. No vendor publishes a per-device or per-user price, so the estimator shows no costs; the AWS Marketplace list prices for Noma Security and Lasso Security are on their profiles.

With your agents (Claude Code, Cursor and GitHub Copilot), 3 of 13 products name all of them; 13 of 13 document every verdict you checked.

Frequently asked questions

Does the estimator measure my risk?

No. The exposure tally counts the items you checked, and the ranking re-weights our editorial scores. Nothing scans your devices or agents.

Why does a product not move when I uncheck an agent?

Agents and verdicts change the columns and the filters, not the scores. Only the weight sliders change the ranking.

Why are there no prices?

No vendor publishes a per-device or per-user price. Noma Security and Lasso Security list annual contracts on AWS Marketplace, shown on their profiles. We do not estimate prices.

What do the suggested weights do?

They raise the weight of stopping actions before they run, cloud and workspace reach or verdict range when your answers point that way, and say which sliders changed. You can move any slider afterwards.

Scores are editorial assessments from public sources read on the date shown.